Rather than focus on donations and endorsements from corporations to ensure appointment, they must prove fairness and adherence to the law to keep citizens invested in keeping them in the courtroom. And while the timing is, indeed, interesting, Abbott's sincerity deserves the benefit of the doubt. Other candidates who get money from donors are also susceptible to influence from them. by Ross Ramsey 2023 www.caller.com. 3. Busy blogger and mom of two girls! Such lawyers would be likely to serve in an appointed system, however. 4hMWV5Pfu9oUc@+ -CK})_$].. %PDF-1.4 While some argue its unsuccessful, others believe some benefits of the system is good for the state. Why do we do this? Notify me of follow-up comments by email. Judge Both Scott and Marion think that's a good place to start; there is no easy way to find out about candidates for judge. Even the Texas lawmakers who want to change the way the state selects judges are wary of taking that power away from voters. When a judicial vacancy occurs, who do you think a Republican governor is going to appoint? Appointments are a more efficient mechanism for selecting judges than elections. The 2020 election year is well underway, which means youve probably been considering where to cast your vote. Your donation keeps our trusted reporting free and accessible for all Texans and during a legislative session when lawmakers are set to tackle issues from school choice for K-12 students to school safety improvements to changes in property taxes, its critical that Texans know what lawmakers decisions mean for their futures. Photos: Were you 'seen' at United-Brook basketball game? When Judge Marion runs, she knows it's difficult for voters to learn about her. Thanks, I honestly support the idea of voting for judges. The Death Penalty allows families that have been suffering some closure. Depending on where you live, you might even be electing judges this year. Texas is one of only six states that pick members of their supreme courts with elections, one of only six that pick appellate court justices this way, and one of nine states thatasks citizens to choose district court judges with a partisan vote. As in states like Texas, where judges are elected like everyone else, thats subject to outside influence by political donors and interest groups hoping to influence the direction of the courts, if not the outcomes of specific cases. Elections ensure that judges are accountable to the people. When citizens have the chance to elect their own judges, it is believed to help rebuild faith in the judicial system and in the government as a whole. Jp=oLH?cK-GeKV'J;1]{^ |cYhWYfZ The politics are more difficult, in some ways, than the proposed policy changes. At least with the current system, voters get to have their say at the front end instead of settling for something on the back end - a chance to retain appointed judges. When judges are elected rather than appointed, they must appeal to the public. These critics contend judges are not recusing themselves enough when a campaign donor is involved in a court case before the judge. It ensures that they maintain high ethical standards and follow the constitution to the end for fear of being voted out if they do the contrary. During election years, judges are more likely to rule in accordance with the popular opinion of citizens rather than what is legally fair or right. But the effort has grown legs lately in no small part because Gov. We can't make promises and can't prejudge a case, often what those seeking political office do. The reformers biggest challenge might be in convincing state legislators they can protect judges from voters without getting in trouble with those same voters in the bargain. This is especially true during election years. But if you voted in the past three elections and didn't skip the judicial races, you helped pick the members of those two courts, plus lots of other judges. Its an issue of more interest to the judges and to the legal community, on a day-to-day basis, than to the rest of us. At the top of the Texas court system sit two high courts, the Supreme Court and the Court of Criminal Appeals. On average, judges will earn between $180,000 and $270,000 per year. Scott thinks the system worked well back then, when most people lived in small towns and everyone knew everyone. The proposal was promising. Both parties present a field candidate and the The lack of opposition means that the accountability described above is eliminated altogether in some situations. Web668 words 3 page (s) In Texas, all judges, including civil and criminal types, are elected in partisan elections. The main con of electing judges is that it can lead to politicization of the judiciary and can make it difficult for judges to be impartial. document.getElementById( "ak_js_1" ).setAttribute( "value", ( new Date() ).getTime() ); This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. "For myself, it was very difficult to campaign for office, because you have to raise money," Marion says. Could West Brook, United playoff game break Montagne Center attendance record? If the committee devises a new system The state might take that The Diane Rehm Show discusses how judicial elections and appointment processes impact fairness in state courts. When comparing it to other states outside of Texas, it is different in many ways. WebEach side has pros and cons. If the people feel that a judge is doing a poor job or is abusing their power, the people have an opportunity to vote in I hate election day because leader already chosen its just a formality to vote. Pros and Cons of the Death Penalty Pros 1. Or how about all nine members of the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals? We have a code of ethics and are limited by what we can and can't say. Seven states choose their judges in partisan elections at every level. Appointing judges further perpetuates that belief. To see more, visit KUT 90.5. WebThe pros of electing judges in Texas are that it allows for more accountability and transparency in the judicial system. Whats more, its potentially risky for a legislator to cross the voters that way without some very clear signal that the voters want to make the change, to give up the power to choose judges. If the judge has disappointed voters for whatever reason, voters can get rid of him. Politics can be played with appointments to review panels and elsewhere in any process that the legislative committee devises. Sandee Marion, chief justice of the Fourth Court of Appeals in San Antonio, is among them. We hope you share our vision of a legal system that works for all people by being accessible, fair, reliable, efficient, and accountable. /c-@T*?6{/h*aRBYsw\z31Gq8oxr,{S>;Tfy5F>4Wv #e/XmPE86a.#p/l$D12 R3`Z&53P/2h Wh"I"x(R1n`j'.%**=0BMh < EvvYJ'~n 3HJyOy(xFx):;HP 'z64HO. When judges are elected rather than appointed, they must appeal to the public. "But when voter preferences in a district vary substantially, and the goal is for a judge to represent the ideology of their constituency, an election system may be better," she concludes in her paper. Then, when political tides shift, good judges from the formerly dominant party are thrown out with the bad to make room for new judges from the new majority party. Lol I must admit I am one of those who feel that judges and other government officials are in the pockets of large corporations. Question: 1. Discuss the pros and cons of electing judges in Texas. She'd ask lawyer friends who they'd recommend and why. The problem with how we elected judges currently in a partisan election, is that a lot of money is required. Welcome to A Nation of Moms! Voters elect Texas' judges. The state might take that power but it's risky. | The Texas Tribune Analysis: Voters elect Texas' judges. The state might take that power but it's risky. Even the Texas lawmakers who want to change the way the state selects judges are wary of taking that power away from voters. He still fights to make a change from his new position as a constitutional law professor. In analyzing data on judges for the state of Kansas, one of the few states that has within-state variation in how judges are chosen, Lim found that "the sentencing harshness of elected judges is strongly related to the political ideology of the voters in their districts, while that of appointed judges is not.". And because governors are elected by all the voters in a state, their choices better reflect the median voter in the state, rather than local preferences. Tom Phillips believed that he could make an impact on changing the judicial structure, but was then persuaded by the legislature that he would not be able to. Tort reform is said to be good for Texas, and over the past years lawsuit improvements have changed our state in becoming the nations representation for civil justice reform. The best way to decide where to cast your vote is to research candidates as soon as possible. Some critics argue elections create political biases which weaken judicial impartiality. Others argue elections provide a way for the people to hold judges accountable and that the key to keeping courts fair and impartial is by educating the public.These critics argue that appointments allow for no such accountability. Its also natural for voters to have more faith in their own choices than in the choices of the very political people they elect to offices like governor and the Senate. Thanks for the information. WebThe election of judges can initially affect the way justice in Texas is seen by not balancing the true equality of the Electoral Fraud And Election Fraud There are four possible solutions to election fraud. If the committee devises a new system that still gives the party in power the upper hand in the judiciary but also does all of that it might be as big a step toward perfection as we can hope to see in this imperfect world. Other states have retention elections, giving judges the opportunity to do their jobs without attracting enough voter anger to get tossed out of office. But elections of public officials such as judges may have serious drawbacks. WebAnother advantage sometimes discussed with respect to having some form of election of judges is that such systems promote a more dynamic, responsive judiciary. <> She has done commercials and mailings, but says that only gives voters information Dan Patrick recently cited when expressing doubts about calls for reform. Not a good practice. If you can't name elected judges and certainly didn't donate to their campaigns, who do you think will have the most influence on them? Partisan Election (current system) Pros: Voters have a direct say in judges who decide cases that have a huge impact In a normal election, candidates in the races at the top for president, for governor and the like are usually well known to voters. WebThe nonpartisan election of judges is a selection method where judges are chosen through elections where they are listed on the ballot without an indication of their political affiliation. Texas is one, but it's about to give a serious look at changing that. Party-loyal voters who can't name who's running tend to vote for their party. You have to do the work. The record is mixed. Elected judges rely on being liked by the people to remain in office, and sometimes that pressure to be liked is reflected in their court decisions. Find their verified websites and social media accounts, read past news stories, and learn where they stand on the issues that are important to you. Jan. 20, 202012 AM Central. Copyright 2012 - 2022 A Nation of Moms | All Rights Reserved, judges are more likely to rule in accordance with the popular opinion, Applications of Different Types of Probability Distribution, A Guide To Poverty And Politics In The US, 6 Health Benefits of Drinking Single Malt Scotch Whiskey, Does Your Roof Need To Be Replaced? WebPros and Cons of Various Judicial Selection Methods . You're in good company with countless graduate-degreed Texans. The initial term of office for the supreme court is ten years, while district court judges are elected to six-year terms. The reformers will have to convince them that people in places like Austin and Washington have a better idea of who ought to be on the bench than the voters themselves have. The amount of free press and name recognition associated with it is definitely a plus. The Texas Judicial system is a puzzling topic to most citizens and has its pros and cons. In large cities like Houston or Dallas, voters are confronted with long lists of judges at election time. I discussed information about the judicial system in texas, how texas elects judges, issues that citizens have with the selecting of judges, and i expressed myself with precision in riting. Lim points out that public critique during a campaign is a disincentive to lawyers to seek office; this can result in the best candidate for a judgeship declining to compete for the position. State Judicial Selection: A Discussion of the Pros and Cons of Various Selection Methods. In traditional economic thought, competition is always good, and just as it's good for the economy, competitive elections should also make things better. On this issue, as with so many others, remember the old saying: When in doubt, trust the people. Voters then have periodic chances to vote judges they dont like out of office. Additionally, it gives voters a say in who they want to preside over their cases. All rights reserved. He has understandable reason not to like those elections: His son, Ryan, was one of the Harris County judges voted out of office in 2016, part of the blue wave that continued into 2018. WebElecting judges makes them accountable to the public. Pros: Electing judges results in a judiciary that is more responsive to public concerns, less out of touch with what the people want. Electing judges allows the people of a given community to have a say in what kind of criminal justice system they want and what kind of priorities it should have. As a quick guide, partisan elections are those that show a judges political party, whole non-partisan ballots do not provide political party information. These are factors that voters understand and legitimately take into consideration when choosing judges. For starters, it's hard to understand why a judge from one party would have a different view than a judge from the other party on a criminal case or a civil lawsuit. Texas partisan judicial elections unlikely to change despite We love traveling and the great outdoors, and are always looking for our next adventure! This special committee and the 2021 Legislature can do better than that. uGF3v?._?G/v>\`9 ?t>[dY_ZS3NU!T#F;=?) WebRather than electing judicial officials, Texas should adopt a system of having a governor, or the Senate, appoint its judges, then every few years, voters sustain the right to retain those judges if they so desire. Candidates like Judge Michael Tawil must prove themselves as pillars in their communities. The goal of tort reform in texas, according to Attorney General Greg Abbott, has always been to create and maintain a fair, honest and predictable civil justice system that balances the rights of both plaintiffs and defendants. WebPros And Cons Of The Texas Judicial System 800 Words4 Pages Ideally, being able to elect judges seems like a fair concept. Judicial Reform: A three-part series. Part one: Partisan elections are the wrong way to choose judges. Learn how your comment data is processed. You have to tout yourself. That recognition doesnt often travel far down the ballot, and judges are elected largely on the basis of political party and whether they have melodious names. Culver says that for years she has been getting information on candidates for judge through the grapevine. stream Lim points out that governors have an advantage when appointing judges because they are likely to have more accurate information about the political preferences and sentencing approaches of a candidate than is generally available to voters during a campaign. After sixteen years in the spot of state Supreme Court Chief Justice, Tom Phillips publicized his retirement. The clean slate in 1988, was the rallying cry Texas physicians and a union of other business and professional groups used eight years ago when they decided to take back the supreme court. Don't fret if you can't. Opponents argue that tort reform is not only legislative tampering with the judicial system but favors these powerful professions and business interest groups who seek to be protected from punishment for practices and products that cause harm to citizens. The five student learning outcomes that applied to the topics i discussed are, describe state and local political systems and their relationship to the government, demonstrate knowledge of the legislative, executive, and judicial branches of texas government, analyze the state and local election process, analyze issues, policies, and political culture of texas, and lastly express oneself with precision and clarity, whether orally or in writing. Justice is better served. 0,0 % CQ QXJXX$An>{t_+Q|G^5j&GzdUJqs^Xz1=wb1sx SE&{4627>5Ok !~3vMnk=%tx%{M+w6J|{d$)n20WLw8I2'IQ\agDDb}H48+HH/'5nwKmgO.XLZ8t ^[Z=( In reality, however, that system is broken. No solution will circumvent party politics and undue influences entirely. Phone: 650-931-2505 | Fax: 650-931-2506 Judges should be elected by the governor, and then every few years, voters can get a chance to keep that judge during election time. Tom Phillips believes that, the current system, where judges are chosen by partisan elections, should be changed in which the governor elects judges who would then face non-partisan retention elections. In theory, the concept of electing judges seems fair. Nonpartisan judicial elections meaning that the candidates refrain from declaring a party affiliation and don't run in party primaries would be another. His interest in this issueis not new. Scott says. "It has not been modified seriously since 1891, so to an extent we're back in horse and buggy days. We love the great outdoors, vegetarian food, camping, travel, swimming, reading, and more.. plus sharing our experiences on the blog! Doing so will help you vote for who you think will be the best judge in your city or county. Judges are paid well because they are one of the highest positions within the legal system. Wayne Scott says history is behind it. 4. "We should focus more on designing a good system that reflects these lessons from the data," she says. Being pro-defendant means you are the party against which an action is brought. Texas elects judges, relying on voters to sort through pages and pages of ballot undergrowth, figuring out which candidates are fit to put on the judicial robes. Many prominent, fair-minded lawyers and politicians, including some sitting appellate judges, have sought change for a long time. Linda B. Glaser is staff writer for the College of Arts and Sciences. Many have failed, been rejected and have given up, while others take rejection has a reason to fight harder and fix the Judicial system. Editor's note: If you'd like an email notice whenever we publish Ross Ramsey's column, click here. WebThe Texas Judicial system is a puzzling topic to most citizens and has its pros and cons. |/~6ulX+~_drxnE9@{Gc "Then when you voted for a judge you knew who you were voting for and what you were getting." And putting judges on the ballot is popular with voters, even though some judges think its unseemly to join political parties, to raise money from people who might have interests before the courts or from lawyers who practice before those judges, and to stump for votes and support like other politicians. In large cities like Houston or Dallas, voters are confronted with long lists of judges at election time. Dream on. WebI AM AN ELECTED JUDGE. Educating yourself is the most important thing you can do to ensure we have a strong judicial system.". OHIO: All judges are selected in partisan elections for six-year terms. 1900 S. Norfolk St., Suite 350, San Mateo, CA 94403 WebOnly six states, including Texas, elect justices in a partisan race. Texas elects their judges (except at some of the municipal levels) in partisan elections, and the table below depicts the specifics for each level of court. Merit selection is a way around some of that; in Missouri and other states, nonpartisan panels of lawyers compile lists of qualified people from which a governor makes appointments. Shes been a judge for 26 years, and shes had to run for office several times. You or the people who have given them money and know them by first name? Southeast Texas continues to see 'moderate' air quality, "Cocaine Bear" inspires R-rated collectible figures, Buna residence searched due to a 2021 missing person's case, Beaumont antique store owner opens new boutique, Chick-Fil-A location says anyone under age 16 must be accompanied. The Texas Judicial system is described as complicated, negligent, and poorly structured to handle current legal proceedings. Answer: Influential lawyers, businesspeople and lobbyists who donate to their campaigns. With an opportunity for six of the nine seats to be chosen in one election, those who usually dont get involved and just watch decided to get involved this time. w69"""eUFeyj@uf$}KxPg?>(JEz Q3E!8(-iOBEwk^7/!=t%[ But another bill, authored by state Rep. Todd Hunter, R-Corpus Christi, passed with Abbott's enthusiastic support. Texas Parks and Wildlife Department needs your input, Here's this weekend's Beaumont Mural Fest lineup. At the very least, theyre supposed to appear to be acting that way. \kdQyyW36rzm7jV; V+3]X66|Mx$}eIYmZ UbF: %R2oFk; }\d[kadF;-lfZ(BoIw=G|mZqY SGRBr{pmuJb4bgNw^gaj883z~o-!${XtK60uSX1ht_i-Zk(~$Cq:"&~P4\&"BXX?W/F=00p t;kiR]nIp[&tk The federal government uses appointment, relying on presidents to pick judges and on the U.S. Senate to confirm the qualified ones, sorting legal wizards from rotten eggs. In return, the judges will be in favor to a certain party, thus creating a corrupt system that does not represent its people and democracy. F^J$L0;uv^F-2 zjqh And it's not always easy for everyone to do," she says. Texas should keep the election, lose the partisan labels. You can check out the pros and cons and make your own decision. 2023 University of Denver. In the case of state court judges, for example, elected judges are far more variable in their sentencing than appointed judges, according to a new study. Please join the effort by making a gift today. I also share my vegetarian recipes at www.thebusyvegetarian.com. Marion ran as a Republican, but stressed the job is nonpartisan. 2. WebNORTH DAKOTA: All judges are selected in non-partisan elections. Each court has nine judges and when comparing the texas Judicial system to other states only one other state has a similar high court system and no other state has as many high court judges. The people who keep trying to change the way Texas selects its judges say they will remove politics from the system. Often, the best person loses to the person from the preferred political party. Right again; a Democratic lawyer. Those who feel non-partisan ballots have no place in voting believe that lack of political parties means people have no meaningful information to go on if they dont already know of the judge and may even be less likely to vote for someone with a name that sounds ethnic. They 'd recommend and why the pros and cons and make your own decision in non-partisan.... Publish Ross Ramsey 's column, click here way to choose judges to choose judges within...: Influential lawyers, businesspeople and lobbyists who donate to their campaigns to decide where to cast your vote to! Despite we love traveling and the Court of Appeals in San Antonio is...: Influential lawyers, businesspeople and lobbyists who donate to their campaigns when judges are accountable to person... To most citizens and has its pros and cons and make your own decision Marion, chief justice, Phillips. Cons and make your own decision is required Department needs your input, here this! Then, when most people lived in small towns and everyone knew everyone rather appointed... At election time at United-Brook basketball game and while the timing is, indeed, interesting Abbott... Campaign donor is involved in a Court case before the judge has disappointed voters for whatever reason voters... Argue elections create political biases which weaken judicial impartiality Discussion of the doubt thing you can better... An extent we 're back in horse and buggy days, judges will earn between $ 180,000 and $ per... Candidates like judge Michael Tawil must prove themselves as pillars in their communities of... Weekend 's Beaumont Mural Fest lineup sought change for a long time n't who... When most people lived in small towns and everyone knew everyone have given money... Politics can be played with appointments to review panels and elsewhere in process... Partisan judicial elections meaning that the candidates refrain from declaring a party affiliation and n't. Be the best way to decide where to cast your vote many prominent, fair-minded lawyers and politicians including! Ross Ramsey 's column, click here an action is brought process that candidates! Office several times Texas judicial system is described as complicated, negligent and! In party primaries would be another, when most people lived in small and. Mural Fest lineup Supreme Court and the Court of Criminal Appeals for she. 3 page ( s ) in Texas ten years, and shes had to run for office several.! Be likely to serve in an appointed system, however 'd ask lawyer friends who they want to preside their! L0 ; uv^F-2 zjqh and it 's risky is ten years, are. Seems pros and cons of electing judges in texas a fair concept a constitutional law professor: partisan elections and. And undue influences entirely Tawil must prove themselves as pillars in their communities linda B. is. Before the judge other candidates who get money from donors are also susceptible to influence from them admit am! Party against which an action is brought pros of electing judges in Texas to terms!: voters elect Texas ' judges in any process that the legislative committee devises judges than elections he still to!, is that a lot of money is required shes been a judge for 26 years, and always! Election time theyre supposed to appear to be acting that way Tribune Analysis: voters elect Texas judges. Suffering some closure stressed the job is nonpartisan prejudge a case, often what those seeking political do... Field candidate and the 2021 Legislature can do to ensure we have a strong judicial system 800 Words4 Ideally... Lawyers and politicians, including some sitting appellate judges, including some appellate. The problem with how we elected judges currently in a Court case before the judge recognition! Answer: Influential lawyers, businesspeople and lobbyists who donate to their campaigns preferred party... The data, '' she says appointments to review panels and elsewhere in any process the..., trust the people lobbyists who donate to their campaigns B. Glaser is staff writer for the of... To run for office several times Ramsey 's column, click here candidates! Click here office for the Supreme Court and the Court of Criminal Appeals to from..., when most people lived in small towns and everyone knew everyone they want to change the way state! These lessons from the data, '' she says undue influences entirely she says because are. Outdoors, and poorly structured to handle current legal proceedings she has getting. Fest lineup have serious drawbacks and undue influences entirely party affiliation and do run! For their party everyone to do, '' Marion says lessons from the system worked well back then, most! Has disappointed voters for whatever reason, voters are confronted with long lists of judges at election.! Has grown legs lately in no small part because Gov the legal system ``! And elsewhere in any process that the legislative committee devises wary of taking that power from... It 's about to give a serious look at changing that, she knows it 's about give. To choose judges not recusing themselves enough when a campaign donor is involved in a partisan election lose. Voting for judges Court case before the judge circumvent party politics and undue influences.! States outside of Texas, it gives voters a say in who they 'd and. That way you or the people who have given them money and know them first. 'S column, click here n't name who 's running tend to vote who! Judicial vacancy occurs, who do you think will be the best judge in your city or county have them. At every level are limited by what we can and ca n't a... Are confronted with long lists of judges at election time are paid well they. Legislature can do better than that system sit two high courts, the Supreme Court is ten,. Declaring a party affiliation and do n't run in party primaries would be.. Texas is one, but it 's about to give a serious look at changing that n't... Voters a say in who they 'd recommend and why zjqh and it risky. From donors are also susceptible to influence from them help you vote for who you pros and cons of electing judges in texas. Consideration when choosing judges present a field candidate and the the lack of opposition means that the candidates from! Criminal types, are elected to six-year terms well underway, which means probably. Better than that this issue, as with so many others, remember the old saying when... Six-Year terms many others, remember the old saying: when in doubt, trust the people Court are! Input, here 's this weekend 's Beaumont Mural Fest lineup loses the! Center attendance record businesspeople and lobbyists who donate to their campaigns your city or county keep the election, the... Abbott 's sincerity deserves the benefit of the Fourth Court of Criminal Appeals Texas is one, it! Preferred political party your city or county are always looking for our adventure! Sit two high courts, the concept of electing judges in Texas Marion runs, she knows 's. Ask lawyer friends who they 'd recommend and why party-loyal voters who ca name. Understand and legitimately take into consideration when choosing judges in party primaries be. Stressed the job is nonpartisan highest positions within the legal system. `` basketball! Whenever we publish Ross Ramsey 's column, click here getting information on candidates judge... Might even be electing judges this year elections are the party against an... Doubt, trust the people Penalty allows families that have been suffering some closure =?: all,. Weekend 's Beaumont Mural Fest lineup can do better than that Fourth Court of Criminal Appeals dont out. Lessons from the system worked well back then, when most people in... Run in party primaries would be another._? G/v > \ `?... Of opposition means that the candidates refrain from declaring a party affiliation and do n't run party! Is a puzzling topic to most citizens and has its pros and cons the... You can do to ensure we have a code of ethics and are limited by what we can ca... Who do you think will be the best judge in your city or county political. Can get rid of him be the best person loses to the person from the system. `` weekend Beaumont! 2021 Legislature can do to ensure we have a strong judicial system. `` enough a! Everyone to do, '' she says that a lot of money is required focus more designing! The judicial system. `` ugf3v?._? G/v > \ `?. Attendance record it allows for more accountability and transparency in the spot of state Supreme is. Office, because you have to raise money, '' Marion says great outdoors, and shes to... Am one of those who feel that judges are selected in partisan elections are the party against which action... Problem with how we elected judges currently in a Court case before the judge has disappointed voters whatever... That for years she has been getting information on candidates for judge through the.... > [ dY_ZS3NU! t # F ; =? how we elected judges currently in a case..., because you have to raise money, '' she says linda B. Glaser is staff writer for the Court. Tribune Analysis: voters elect Texas ' judges make a change from his new position a... Death Penalty allows families that have been suffering some closure is, indeed interesting! Lawmakers who want to preside over their cases thing you can do to ensure we a. Appointed, they must appeal to the public how we elected judges currently in a case...