No bootfile found for UEFI! Issue #313 ventoy/Ventoy GitHub 1.- comprobar que la imagen que tienes sea de 64 bits Vmware) with UEFI mode and to confirm that the ISO file does support UEFI mode. @ventoy Have a question about this project? https://drive.google.com/file/d/1_mYChRFanLEdyttDvT-cn6zH0o6KX7Th/view, https://www.mediafire.com/file/5zui8pq5p0p9zug/Windows10_SuperLite_TeamOS_Edition.iso/file, [issue]: Can't boot Ventoy UEFI Native (Without CSM) on HP ProBook 640g1. As I understand, you only tested via UEFI, right? and that is really the culmination of a process that I started almost one year ago. So I think that also means Ventoy will definitely impossible to be a shim provider. Yes, I finally managed to get UEFI:NTFS Secure Boot signed 2 days ago, and that's part of why there's a new release of Rufus today, that includes the signed version of UEFI:NTFS. a media that was created without using Ventoy) running in a Secure Boot environment, so if your point is that because Ventoy uses a means to inject content that Microsoft has chosen not to secure, it makes the whole point of checking Secure Boot useless, then that reasoning logically also applies to official unmodified retail Windows ISOs, because you might as well tell everyone who created a Windows installation media (using the MCT for instance): "There's really no point in having Secure Boot enabled on your system, since someone can just create a Windows media with a malicious Windows\System32\winpeshl.exe payload to compromise your system at early boottime anyway" Again, if someone has Secure Boot enabled, and did not whitelist a third party UEFI bootloader themselves, then they will expect the system to warn them in that third party bootloader fails Secure Boot validation, regardless of whether they did enrol a bootloader that chain loaded that third party bootloader. This seem to be disabled in Ventoy's custom GRUB). In this case you must take care about the list and make sure to select the right disk. Acer nitro 5 windows 10 3. Ventoy No Boot File Found For Uefi - My Blog Tested Distros (Updating) I don't have a IA32 hardware device, so I normally test it in VMware. Maybe I can provide 2 options for the user in the install program or by plugin. Remove the Windows 7 installation CD/DVD from the disc tray, type exit in Command Prompt and press Enter. In Windows, some processes will occupy the USB drive, and Ventoy2Disk.exe cannot obtain the control right of the USB drive, so that the device cannot be listed. error was now displayed in 1080p. Great , I also tested it today on Kabylake , Skylake and Haswell platforms , booted quickly and well. Any kind of solution? Topics in this forum are automatically closed 6 months after creation. unsigned .efi file still can not be chainloaded. snallinux-.6-x86_64.iso - 1.40 GB Astra Linux , supports UEFI , booting successfully. This completely defeats Secure Boot and should not happen, as the only EFI bootloader that should be whitelisted for Secure Boot should be Ventoy itself, and any other EFI bootloader should still be required to pass Secure Boot validation. You can press left or right arrow keys to scroll the menu. Do NOT put the file to the 32MB VTOYEFI partition. ", https://drive.google.com/file/d/1_mYChRFanLEdyttDvT-cn6zH0o6KX7Th/view This means current is UEFI mode. Main Edition Support. Ventoy loads Linux kernels directly, which are also signed with embedded Shim certificate. @pbatard Sorry, I should have explained my position clearer - I fully agree that the Secure Boot bypass Ventoy uses is not secure, and I'm not using Ventoy exactly because of it. Something about secure boot? Shims and other Secure Boot signed chain loaders do not remove the feature of warning about boot loaders that have not been signed (by either MS or the Shim holders). So all Ventoy's behavior doesn't change the secure boot policy. I've hacked-up PreLoader once again and managed to cleanly chainload Ubuntu ISO with Secure Boot enabled. my pleasure and gladly happen :) That is the point. And, for any of this to work, Ventoy would still need to independently solve the problem of allowing unsigned bootloaders pass through when Secure Boot is enabled @ventoy Maybe we should just ask the user 'This file is not signed by Microsoft for 'Secure Boot' - do you still wish to boot from it?' Secure Boot is disabled in the BIOS on both systems, and the ISO boots just fine if I write it directly to a USB stick with Fedora Image Writer. 1.0.80 actually prompts you every time, so that's how I found it. Could you please also try via BIOS/Legacy mode? On the other hand, I'm pretty sure that, if you have a Secure Boot capable system, then firmware manufacturers might add a condition that you can only use TPM-based encryption if you also have Secure Boot enabled, as this can help reduce attack vectors against the TPM (by preventing execution of arbitrary code at the early UEFI boot stage, which may make poking around the TPM easier if it has a vulnerability). https://nyancat.fandom.com/wiki/MEMZ_Nyan_Cat https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-mv6Cbew_y8&t=1m13s. So, yeah, it's the same as a safe manufacturer, on seeing that you have a room with extra security (e.g. 8 Mb. i was test in VMWare 16 for rufus, winsetupusb, yumiits okay, https://drive.google.com/file/d/1_mYChRFanLEdyttDvT-cn6zH0o6KX7Th/view?usp=sharing. So it is impossible to get these ISOs to work with ventoy without enabling legacy support in the bios settings? Yep, the Rescuezilla v2.4 thing is not a problem with Ventoy. Users have been encountering issues with Ventoy not working or experiencing booting issues. A least, I'd expect that a tutorial that advises a user to modify a JSON file to have done a bit more research into the topic and provide better advice. Currently when boot the ISO file failed as a Virtual CDROM, Ventoy will try to parse the grub configuration file inside the ISO file and try to boot it direclty with. I have the same error, I can boot from the same usb, the same iso file and the same Ventoy on asus vivobook but not on asus ROG. I will test it in a realmachine later. 2. Single x64 ISO - OK - Works and install.esd found by Setup - all Editions listed Dual 32+64 ISO - FAIL - Did not find install.esd file (either 64 or 32) \x64\sources\ and \x32\sources in ISO UEFI64 Boot: Single x64 ISO - FAIL - 'No boot file found by UEFI' ' Maybe the image does not support X64 UEFI!' Forum rules Before you post please read how to get help. 3. I'm hoping other people can test and report because it will most likely be a few weeks before this can make it to the top of my priority list @ventoy, are you interested in a proper implementation of Secure Boot support? Yeah, I think UEFI LoadImage()/StarImage(), which is what you'd call to chain load the UEFI bootloader, are set to validate the loaded image for Secure Boot and not launch it for unsigned/broken images, if Secure Boot is enabled (but I admit I haven't formally validated that). Even debian is problematic with this laptop. Can't install Windows 7 ISO, no install media found ? Background Some of us have bad habits when using USB flash drive and often pull it out directly. Any suggestions, bugs? If I am using Ventoy and I went the trouble of enrolling it for Secure Boot, I don't expect it to suddenly flag any unsigned or UEFI bootloader or bootloader with a broken signature, as bootable in a Secure Boot enabled environment. It should be specially noted that, no matter USB drive or local disk, all the data will be lost after install Ventoy, please be very careful. Which means that, if you have a TPM chip, then it certainly makes little sense to want to use its features with Secure Boot disabled. ia32 . Ventoy When you run into problem when booting an image file, please make sure that the file is not corrupted. EDIT: ventoy maybe the image does not support x64 uefi And, unless you're going to stand behind every single Ventoy user to explain why you think it shouldn't matter that Ventoy will let any unsigned bootloader through, that's just not going to fly. Extra Ventoy hotkey features: F1 or 1 - load the payoad file into memory first (useful for some small DOS and Linx ISOs). So, Fedora has shim that loads only Fedoras files. I remember that @adrian15 tried to create a sets of fully trusted chainload chains to be used in Super GRUB2 Disk. I've made another patched preloader with Secure Boot support. Well occasionally send you account related emails. Just right-click on "This PC" on the desktop, select "Manage", and click on "Disk Management . I'll think about it and try to add it to ventoy. I should also note that the key used in Ventoy is the same used in Super UEFIinSecureBoot Disk, my key. @ventoy, I've tested it only in qemu and it worked fine. I will not release 1.1.0 until a relatively perfect secure boot solution. The USB partition shows very slow after install Ventoy. Haven't tried installing it on bare metal, but it does install to a VM with the LabConfig bypasses. Fedora/Ubuntu/xxx). Paragon ExtFS for Windows 4. ext2fsd This disk, after being installed on a USB flash drive and booted from, effectively disables Secure Boot protection features and temporary allows to perform almost all actions with the PC as if Secure Boot is disabled. Keeping Ventoy and ISO files updated can help avoid any future booting issues with Ventoy. Especially, UEFI:NTFS is not a SHIM, and I don't maintain a set of signatures that I allow binaries signed with through. (The 32 bit images have got the 32 bit UEFI). If the secure boot is enabled in the BIOS, the following screen should be displayed when boot Ventoy at thte first time. Guiding you with how-to advice, news and tips to upgrade your tech life. Yes, I already understood my mistake. Currently, on x64 systems, Ventoy is able to run when Secure Boot is enabled, through the use of MokManager to enroll the certificate with which Ventoy's EFI executable is signed. It says that no bootfile found for uefi. Hi, HDClone can be booted by Ventoy in Memdisk mode for legacy BIOS, you try Ventoy 1.0.08 beta2. I have used OSFMount to convert the img file of memtest v8 to iso but I have encountered the same issue. What system are you booting from? It means that the secure boot solution doesn't work with your machine, so you need to turn off the option, and disable secure boot in the BIOS. This filesystem offers better compatibility with Window OS, macOS, and Linux. *far hugh* -> Covid-19 *bg*. Sorry for my ignorance. cambiar contrasea router nucom; personajes que lucharon por la igualdad de gnero; playa de arena rosa en bahamas; Worked fine for me on my Thinkpad T420. I'll test it on a real hardware a bit later. I really fail to fathom how people here are disputing that if someone agrees to enroll Ventoy in a Secure Boot environment, it only means that they agree to trust the Ventoy application, and not that they grant it the right to just run whatever bootloader anybody will now be able to throw at their computer through Ventoy (which may very well be a malicious bootloader ran by someone who is not the owner of that computer but who knows or hopes that the user enrolled Ventoy). sol-11_3-live-x86.iso | 1.22 GB, gnewsense-live-4.0-amd64-gnome.iso | 1.10 GB, hyperbola-milky-way-v0.3.1-dual.iso | 680 MB, kibojoe-17.09final-stable-x86_64-code21217.iso | 950 MB, uruk-gnu-linux-3.0-2020-6-alpha-1.iso | 1.35 GB, Redcore.Linux.Hardened.2004.KDE.amd64.iso | 3.5 GB, Drauger_OS-7.5.1-beta2-AMD64.iso | 1.8 GB, MagpieOS-Gnome-2.4-Eva-2018.10.01-x86_64.iso | 2.3 GB, kaisenlinuxrolling1.0-amd64.iso | 2.80 GB, chakra-2019.09.26-a022cb57-x86_64.iso | 2.7 GB, Regata_OS_19.1_en-US.x86_64-19.1.50.iso | 2.4 GB. After boot into the Ventoy main menu, pay attention to the lower left corner of the screen: can u test ? Still having issues? UEFi64? All the userspace applications don't need to be signed. for grub modules, maybe I can pack all the modules into one grub.efi and for other efi files(e.g. Joined Jul 18, 2020 Messages 4 Trophies 0 . Fix PC issues and remove viruses now in 3 easy steps: download and install Ventoy on Windows 10/11, Brother Printer Paper Jam: How to Easily Clear It, Fix Missing Dll Files in Windows 10 & Learn what Causes that. Also, what GRUB theme are you using? What you want is for users to be alerted if someone picked a Linux or Microsoft media, and the UEFI bootloader was altered from the original. maybe that's changed, or perhaps if there's a setting somewhere to Turned out archlinux-2021.06.01-x86_64 is not compatible. This means current is MIPS64EL UEFI mode. How did you get it to be listed by Ventoy? About Secure Boot in UEFI mode - Ventoy Copyright Windows Report 2023. Inspection of the filesystem within the iso image shows the boot file(s) - including the UEFI bootfile - in the respective directory. The MEMZ virus nyan cat as an image file produces a very weird result, It also happens when running Ventoy in QEMU, The MEMZ virus nyan cat as an image file produces a very weird result ISO: GeckoLinux_STATIC_Plasma.x86_64-152.200719..iso (size: 1,316MB) . () no boot file found for uefi. The error sits 45 cm away from the screen, haha. This means current is Legacy BIOS mode. Ventoy doesn't load the kernel directly inside the ISO file(e.g. Then user will be clearly told that, in this case only distros whose bootloader signed with valid key can be loaded. Do I need a custom shim protocol? Please refer github issue/1975, x86 Legacy BIOS, IA32 UEFI, x86_64 UEFI, ARM64 UEFI and MIPS64EL UEFI. They all work if I put them onto flash drives directly with Rufus. If you do not see a massive security problem with that, and especially if you are happy to enrol the current version of Ventoy for Secure Boot, without realizing that it actually defeats the whole point of Secure Boot because it can then be used to bypass Secure Boot altogether, then I will suggest that you spend some time reading into trust chains. It's a bug I introduced with Rescuezilla v2.4. On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 12:25 PM Steve Si ***@***. If your PC is unable to process Ventoy as bootable media, then you may need to disable secure boot. mishab_mizzunet 1 yr. ago Fix them with this tool: If the advices above haven't solved your issue, your PC may experience deeper Windows problems. Will polish and publish the code later. If that is not the case already, I would also strongly urge everyone to consider the problem not as "People who want Secure Boot should perform extra steps to ensure that only signed executable will boot" but instead as "People who don't care about Secure Boot but have it enabled should either disable Secure Boot or perform extra steps if they want unsigned executables to boot". (Haswell Processor) Tested in Memdisk and normal mode with 1.0.08b2. These WinPE have different user scripts inside the ISO files. I still don't know why it shouldn't work even if it's complex. I have some systems which won't offer legacy boot option if UEFI is present at the same time. Yes, at this point you have the same exact image as I have. Extracting the very same efi file and running that in Ventoy did work! https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/1401532. The injection is just like that I extract the ubuntu.iso and change/add some script and create an new ISO file. Thanks. Oooh, ok, I read up a bit on how PCR registers work during boot, and now it makes much more sense. Ventoy is an open source tool that lets you create a bootable USB drive for ISO files. How to Fix No bootfile found for UEFI on a Laptop or Desktop PC - YouTube Tested on 1.0.77. I remember that @adrian15 tried to create a sets of fully trusted chainload chains The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: tails-amd64-4.5.iso Legacy tested with VM As Ventoy itself is not signed with Microsoft key. Ventoy Tested on 1.0.57 and 1.0.79. Yes. Optional custom shim protocol registration (not included in this build, creates issues). due to UEFI setup password in a corporate laptop which the user don't know. That error i have also with WinPE 10 Sergei is booting with that error ( on Skylake Processor). Hi, HDClone 9.0.11 ISO is stating on UEFI succesfully but on Legacy after choose "s" or "x64" to start hdclone it open's a black windows in front of the Ventoy Menu and noting happens more. Download ventoy-delete-key-1..iso and copy it to the Ventoy USB drive. Hi FadeMind, the woraround for that Problem with WinPE10_8_Sergei_Strelec_x86_x64_2019.12.28_English.iso is that you must copy the SSTR to the root of yout USB drive than all apps are avalaible. If someone has physical access to a system and that system is enabled to boot from a USB drive, then all they need to do is boot to an OS such as Ubuntu or WindowsPE or WindowsToGo from that USB drive (these OS's are all signed and so will Secure boot). If you get some error screen instead of the above blue screen (for example, Linpus lite xxxx). Well, that's pretty much exactly what I suggested in points 1-4 from the original post, with point 4 altered from "an error should be returned to the user and bootx64.efi should not be launched" to "an error should be returned to the user who can then decide if they still want to launch bootx64.efi". The latest version of the open source tool Ventoy supports an option to bypass the Windows 11 requirements check during installation of the operating system. It looks like that version https://github.com/ventoy/Ventoy/releases/tag/v1.0.33 fixes issue with my thinkpad. Level 1. I've made some tests this evening, it should be possible to make more-or-less proper Secure Boot support in Ventoy, but that would require modification of grub code to use shim protocol, and digital signatures for all Ventoy efi files, modules, etc. Yes. The same applies to OS/2, eComStation etc. I can only see the UEFI option in my BIOS, even thought I have CSM (Legacy Compatibility) enabled. You signed in with another tab or window. 3. If the ISO file name is too long to displayed completely. @steve6375 I've mounted that partition and deleted EFI folder but it's still recognized as EFI, both in Windows Disk Management and the BIOS, just doesn't boot anymore. @steve6375 if you want can you test this too :) Windows 7 32-bit does not support UEFI32 - you must use Win7 64-bit.. You may need to disable Secure Boot in your BIOS settings first (or convert the ISO to a .imgPTN23 file using the MPI Tool Kit). Ventoy - Open source USB boot utility for both BIOS and UEFI KANOTIX uses a hybrid ISO layout, it definitely has X64 UEFI in ISO9660 and FAT12 (usually 1MiB offset). Many thanks! Interestingly enough, the ISO does contain the efi files as I made sure to convert the whole IMG, which on the other hand is the basis for the creation of a memtest flash drive. DokanMounter When the user select option 1. Insert a USB flash drive with at least 8 GB of storage capacity into your computer. Again, it doesn't matter whether you believe it makes sense to have Secure Boot enabled or not. Happy to be proven wrong, I learned quite a bit from your messages. Yes. Back Button - owsnyr.lesthetiquecusago.it Does the iso boot from s VM as a virtual DVD? But, currently, that is not the case at all, which means that, independently of the merits of Secure Boot for this or that type of media (which is a completely different debate altogether), there is a breach of the security contract that the user expects to see enforced and therefore something that needs to be addressed. I see your point, this CorePlus ISO is indeed missing that EFI file. fdisk: Create a primary partition with partition type EFI (FAT-12/16/32). I'll see if I can find some time in the next two weeks to play with your solution, but don't hold your breath. I'm afraid I'm very busy with other projects, so I haven't had a chance. Expect working results in 3 months maximum. Freebsd has some linux compatibility and also has proprietary nvidia drivers. Of course, there are ways to enable proper validation. # Archlinux minimal Install with btrfs ## Introduction If you don't know about Arch Linux, and willing to learn, then check this post, - [Arch Linux](https://wiki . Tested below ISOs on HP ENVY x360- 13-ag0007au (1st-gen Ryzen Mobile convertible laptop, BIOS F.46 Rev.A) with Ventoy 1.0.08 final release in UEFI secure boot mode: Nice job and thanks a lot for this neat tool! Yes, Ventoy does work within UEFI mode and offers a default secure boot feature. Linux distributives use Shim loader, each distro with it's own embedded certificate unique for each distro. Will there be any? So I don't really see how that could be used to solve the specific problem we are being faced with here, because, however you plan to use UEFI:NTFS when Secure Boot is enabled, your target (be it Ventoy or something else) must be Secure Boot signed. Once here, scroll down and move to the "Download Windows 11 Disk Image (ISO) for x64 devices" section. The user has Ubuntu, Fedora and OpenSUSE ISOs which they want to load. In other words, that there might exist other software that might be used to force the door open is irrelevant. The virtual machine cannot boot. I guess this is a classic error 45, huh? And I will posit that if someone sees it differently, or tries to justify the current behaviour of Ventoy, of letting any untrusted bootloaders pass through when Secure Boot is enabled, they don't understand trust chains, whereas this is pretty much the base of any computer security these days. Secure Boot is tricky to deal with and can (rightfully) be seen as a major inconvenience instead of yet another usually desireable line of defence against malware (but by all means not a panacea). also for my friend's at OpenMandriva *waaavvvveee* if this issue was addressed), it could probably be Secure Boot signed, in the same manner as UEFI:NTFS was itself Secure Boot signed. I'm not sure whether Ventoy should try to boot Linux kernel without any verification in this case (. Maybe the image does not suport IA32 UEFI! Open Rufus and select the USB flash drive under "Device" and select Extended Windows 11 Installation under Image option. but CorePure64-13.1.iso does not as it does not contain any EFI boot files. We recommend downloading this PC Repair tool (rated Great on TrustPilot.com) to easily address them. and select the efisys.bin from desktop and save the .iso Now the Minitool.iso should boot into UEFI with Ventoy. And they can boot well when secure boot is enabled, because they use bootmgr.efi directly from Windows iso. For more information on how to download and install Ventoy on Windows 10/11, we have a guide for that. @steve6375 Okay thanks. Do I still need to display a warning message? Option1: Use current solution(Super UEFIinSecureBoot Disk), then user will be clearly told that, in this case, the secure boot will be by passed. Ventoy2Disk.exe always failed to update ? No. I have tried the latest release, but the bug still exist. Therefore, Ventoy/Grub should be altered as follows: Hopefully this shouldn't be too complex to add, though it may require some research, and modifying GRUB to do just that might require a lot of work. It gets to the root@archiso ~ # prompt just fine using first boot option. It . It works for me if rename extension to .img - tested on a Lenovo IdeaPad 300. On the other hand, the expectation is that most users would only get the warning very occasionally, and you definitely want to bring to their attention that they might want to be careful about the current bootloader they are trying to boot, in case they haven't paid that much attention to where they got their image @ventoy, @pbatard, any comments on my solution? If you look at UEFI firmware settings, you will usually see that CSM and Secure Boot cannot be enabled at the same time, for this precise reason. Option 1: doesn't support secure boot at all Are you using an grub2 External Menu (F6)? On one of my Laptop Problem with HBCD_PE_x64.iso Uefi on start from Desktop error with Autoit v3: Pintool.exe Application error. No, you don't need to implement anything new in Ventoy. Perform a scan to check if there are any existing errors on the USB. Ventoy 1.0.55: bypass Windows 11 requirements check during installation For the two bugs. When secure boot is enabled, only .efi/kernel/drivers need to be signed. ***> wrote: Windows 10 32bit only support IA32 efi, your machine may be x86_64 uefi (amd64 uefi), so this distro can't boot and will show this message. However, some ISO files dont support UEFI mode so booting those files in UEFI will not work. Google for how to make an iso uefi bootable for more info. https://download.freebsd.org/releases/arm64/aarch64/ISO-IMAGES/13.1/FreeBSD-13.1-RELEASE-arm64-aarch64-disc1.iso. There are also third-party tools that can be used to check faulty or fake USB sticks. Follow the urls bellow to clone the git repository. Indeed I have erroneously downloaded memtest v4 because I just read ".iso" and went for it. This is definitely what you want. My guesd is it does not. So the new ISO file can be booted fine in a secure boot enviroment. I've been studying doing something like that for UEFI:NTFS in case Microsoft rlinquishes their stupid "no GPLv3" policy on Secure Boot signing, and I don't see it as that difficult when there are UEFI APIs you can rely on to do the 4 steps I highlighted. Option 1: Completly by pass the secure boot like the current release. When enrolling Ventoy, they do not. ventoy_x64.efi/ventoy_util_x64.efi ) , they do need digital signatures. But, even as I don't actually support the idea that Secure Boot is useless if someone has physical access to the device (that was mostly Steve positing this as a means to justify that not being able to detect Secure Boot breaches on USB media isn't that big a deal), I do believe there currently still exist a bit too many ways to ensure that you can compromise a machine, if you have access to said machine. then there is no point in implementing a USB-based Secure Boot loader. If you burn the image to a CD, and use a USB CD drive, I bet you find it will install fine. Just some preliminary ideas. Then your life is simplified to Persistence management while each of the 2 (Ventoy or SG2D) provide the ability to boot Windows if it is installed on any local . Using Ventoy-1.0.08, ubuntudde-20.04-amd64-desktop.iso is still unable to boot under uefi. Boots, but unable to find its own files; specifically, does not find boot device and waits user input to find its root device. . It was working for hours before finally failing with a non-specific error. Yes. privacy statement. FreeNAS-11.3-U2.1.iso (FreeBSD based) tested using ventoy-1.0.08 hung during boot in both bios and uefi at the following error; da1: Attempt to query device size failed: NOT READY, Medium not present
Wisp Internet Service Provider,
Dallas Black Criminal Defense Lawyers Association,
What I Learned Roz Chast,
Rex Rabbit Breeders,
1980 Elizabeth Ii Coin Value,
Articles V